Mar 1st, 2006

 


In this week's newsletter, we feature:

Fear not that the Olympics are over! If you are missing that burn to wager on 'out-of-the-ordinary' events, keep in mind that the 78th Annual Academy Awards go this Sunday and betED has all your lines from Best Actor to Best Picture and more - get your futures in on them now!

OK - so, like most people (according to TV's Nielsen Ratings), maybe you weren't watching the Olympics afterall. There really is no reason to try and draw your attention back to basketball action 'cuz you were apparently here all along! However, if there ever needed to be a reason, this week's betED Girl of the Week would be it. We welcome 'Alyson' to the hallowed halls of GOTW status and figure that apart from being able to draw attention to basketball in general, perhaps she's doing a good job of reminding people that the Golden State Warriors are out there. In our opinion, there's far too much national TV coverage of the Lakers and not enough of the Clippers, Kings and Warriors combined. Nice work Alyson.

We've got lines on your favorite NCAA Basketball & NBA matchups as well as Oscars/Academy Awards & Arena Football futures and don't forget - the end of the Olympics means that the NHL is back! Get your wagers in now!

Hockey you say???



2010 Olympic Hockey?

 

Sub View From the Couch - Was it all worth it?

"The Couch" is on holidays so this week's column was written by betED hockey correspondent William Barilko. Don't worry - The Couch will be back next week!

By now, anyone who was remotely interested would know that neither the US or the Canadian men's hockey teams finished in medal contention during the 2006 Olympics in Turin, Italy. It was supposed to be a classic rematch in which the US was hellbent on exacting revenge on those pesky Canucks to make up for the home-crowd loss in the 2002 Salt Lake games. It was, however, not to be.

The dynamic of '06 Hockey, from a North American perspective, was very different this time around. The US team didn't seem to be entangled in as much drama as the Canadians going into the games with Team Canada Executive Director and hockey legend Wayne Gretzky being tied up in the Rick Tocchet gambling sting as well as questions as to his choices for the team (more on that later) but the US did seem to have some outspoken critics after the games. What was surprising to most, was that disparaging comments were coming from within the organization - on ice level to be specific.

Three time US Olympian Mike Modano ripped into his country's executive group following the US 4-3 loss to Finland that bounced them from the tournament.

"You'd think USA Hockey would be a well-oiled machine, but it's not," he said. "Basically we were on our own for hotels, tickets, flights, stuff like that. Normally we wouldn't have to worry about stuff like that."

Perhaps Mr. Mike was a little upset that he wasn't deemed worthy to even play a significant role in the third period. US Coach Peter Laviolette made that call.

"We were down looking for goals and looking for offense, and it wasn't about Mike Modano," he said. "The third period was clearly our best period... I think some players in general didn't seem to have the jump, and you do your best to get the players out there that have the jump."

At least someone came to Modano's defense - Bill Guerin, teammate on both the Dallas Stars and the US Olympic teams.

"He stuck his neck out there and said something uncomfortable for him to say and definitely uncomfortable for people to hear," Guerin said Tuesday. "In the end, Mike spoke the truth. We had to deal with a lot of other issues along with worrying about the game."

Back in the Canadian dressing room, there was the glaring absence of two legends - Mario Lemieux and Steve Yzerman - both who had withdrawn their names from Olympic consideration due to the fact that THEY ARE OLD. Maybe that was a blessing in disguise though - just not an obvious enough one.

Gretzky and co. stocked this year's Canadian roster with a group who's majority couldn't exactly be referred to as 'spring chickens' either with 18 of the starting 25 in the lineup being born prior to 1980. Yes - the core of this year's team was there to bring home gold during Salt Lake 2002 as well as the 2004 World Cup, but 4 years is a long time in sport-years and takes its toll on an a battered old hockey body (even with a year off for the lockout).

Pittsburgh Penguins rookie standout Sidney Crosby was left off the roster completely, despite sitting 12th in NHL scoring with 65 points in 58 games as were Jonathan Cheechoo and Patrick Marleau, both standouts with the San Jose Sharks this season.

"People are going to question who was on the ice and who was on the team and that's OK," Gretzky told CBC Sports. "I'm a pretty big boy. I can stand up [to any criticism].

"[But] obviously we have to do something different for 2010."

It is indeed, Wayne, a time for the 'changing of the guard'.

My congratulations to Sweden who did end up winning gold but even they had a short lived celebration as NHL players from that winning team were right back on planes heading to their respective North American club cities after a few minutes of Stockholm-style celebration.

All of this tied with injuries to several key players on NHL squads during the Olympics has led to question whether NHL participation beyond 2010 will be feasible. What happens if the best players in the world don't play though? Does it cheapen the event? Let's just wait and see. From the US and Canadian perspective, the feelings right now couldn't be much 'cheaper'.

Maybe there is a lot to be taken from the fallout following this year's Olympics. Maybe the US program needs a revamping and should seriously consider Modano's comments as worthy. Maybe Gretzky's history should be discounted and he shouldn't have the right to decide who suits up for Canada in Vancouver 2010. Maybe all of this hulabaloo is really justified afterall.

... or maybe... it just sucks to lose.

Cheers - William - AKA Sub Couch

Remember to drop us a line at rants@betED.com to voice your opinion on one of McDougald's articles or on anything else you read at betED.com!


AP - NEW YORK -- NFL owners will try Thursday to find labor peace before the start of free agency, hoping to avoid the mass dumping of veterans for salary-cap reasons.

The owners will meet in New York, seeking to find a way toward an agreement with the players union that could add $10 million to 15 million to a 2006 salary cap that current is projected at about $95 million. Without it, some teams could be forced into wholesale cuts to get beneath the cap by midnight. Free agency starts Friday.

Three days of talks between the league and the NFL Players Association to extend the agreement that runs out in 2008 ended Tuesday with the sides far apart on the percentage of league revenues earmarked for players. Gene Upshaw, the union's executive director, said the league is offering to 56.2 percent of its total revenue for the players, almost four points lower than the union's.

"Our number has to start with a six," Upshaw said.

But beyond the numbers is an issue that has divided the owners for two years - revenue sharing among the teams.

Under the current system, some teams make far more than others in ancillary income, ranging from local radio rights to stadium naming rights and advertising. The lower revenue teams say that forces them to commit as much as 70 percent of that money to the players while teams with more outside money contribute far less, giving the high-revenue teams more available cash for upfront bonuses to free agents.

The NFL said in a statement after talks broke off that revenue sharing won't be discussed at Thursday's meeting.

Still, it is bound to come up during a meeting that on the surface is considered a strategy session to determine the owners' next move. Labor negotiations often have a way of being moved forward by deadlines, and revenue sharing is considered a critical part of the formula.

Under the current agreement, 2006 is scheduled to be the last year with a salary cap. An uncapped year in 2007 means new rules that will force teams and agents to change their plans this year and could keep a lot of teams out of the free-agent market entirely.

"It might mean that no rookies get signed because no one is sure of the long-term ramifications," said Tom Condon, the agent for a number of the game's top players.

Even more urgent are salary-cap ramifications for many teams, which anticipated a labor agreement and planned for a much bigger ceiling. Washington, for example, could be as much as $25 million over the salary cap after signings over the past few years that anticipated a salary cap figure well over $100 million.

The ramifications of a lower than anticipated cap were evident Wednesday, when some high-priced veterans were cut. Among them were defensive end Trevor Pryce and running back Mike Anderson of Denver, the team's leading rusher last season. Denver also cut tight end Jeb Putzier.

Buffalo, meanwhile, released defensive tackle Sam Adams and Carolina released three veterans: running back Stephen Davis, defensive tackle Brentson Buckner and kicker returner Rod Smart, "He Hate Me" of old XFL days.

Other teams seem ready for whatever happens.

"We're in pretty good shape," New York Giants general manager Ernie Accorsi said Wednesday. "They're going to give us a cap number and we'll be ready for it. You always prepare for a worst case, no matter what the situation. You never want to be surprised by something negative, only something positive."

Accorsi said he's also not worried about new rules. He said those contingencies are covered in the contracts of two young Pro Bowl players -- tight end Jeremy Shockey and defensive end Osi Umenyiora -- that the Giants extended last fall.

But others are in a different situation, which could mean wholesale cuts of big-name players at midnight Thursday. What happens in the meetings may determine that.

 


Tagliabue and Upshaw (Getty images)


The betED $5 question! It's easy money: Simply come up with the answer to our question within 24 hours of receiving this email, email it to our promotions department and you will have $5 credited to your account. You can collect free money every week* and use it to wager at the betED Sportsbook or Casino.

Q. Which of these name combinations of NBA players do not represent the same person?

A. Lew Alcindor - Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
B. Chris Johnson - Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf
C. Brian Williams - Bison Dele
D. Olivier St. Jean - Tariq Abdul-Wahad

Send the correct answer to promotions@betED.com & include your member user name in the email, and you will win $5!

*Conditions apply.

 

Collect free money every week!*


Thanks again for joining and enjoy all the great sportsbook action and all the hot games we have here at betED.com!

Sincerely,

Customer Service Dept.
help@betED.com
www.betED.com

Toll Free: 1-877-77-betED (1-877-772-3833)

Please visit our website for all other contact info.:
www.betED.com/contactus.aspx
!